When you finish building something, the next question arrives fast. Where do you put it so people actually see it? There are many launch platforms, startup directories and "submit your product" lists, and most of them promise the same thing: visibility, traffic and a link back to your site.
They are not equal. Some are worth an afternoon of careful preparation. Some are worth five minutes. Some are not worth your time at all. This checklist is about telling them apart before you spend the effort, and about preparing a listing that holds up wherever it lands.
The table further down comes from submitting RadarMakers itself to a batch of other launch platforms in one day.
Start with the question "who is there?"
The most important property of a launch platform is its audience, and it is also the easiest one to ignore. A large, marketing-focused audience may be a poor fit for a command-line tool aimed at database engineers. A small, focused community of designers might do more for a design plugin than a giant general directory.
Before you submit anywhere, spend a few minutes browsing the platform as a visitor:
If nobody there would plausibly use what you built, the launch is unlikely to bring many relevant users, no matter how well it performs on the day.
Free queue, paid queue, or pay to play
Many directories are free to submit to, but "free" can mean very different things. A common model is a free queue with a long wait and a paid option to skip ahead. Some platforms show the free waiting time openly. Others only reveal it after you have created an account and filled in the whole form.
None of this is wrong in itself. Running a directory costs money. But you should decide with full information:
A long free queue is fine if you are planning ahead. It is a problem if you need the launch to happen this month.
What a real batch of submissions looked like
Here is what I saw when I submitted one product to a set of free platforms on October 20, 2026. Queue times and link attributes change, so treat this as a snapshot and check again before you rely on it.
| Platform | Cost to submit | Publication status and estimated wait as of October 20, 2026 | Link to the product site |
|---|---|---|---|
| BusinessHunt | Free | Same day | dofollow |
| CLAPSTORM | Free | Same day | dofollow |
| Tech Directory | Free | Same day | nofollow |
| F6S | Free | Same day (profile page) | nofollow |
| SideProjectors | Free | Manual review, stated as 2 to 3 days | not live yet |
| Next Big Product | Free ($0 invoice) | Scheduled about 2.5 weeks out | not live yet |
| HuntScreens | Free | Queue of about 30 days | not live yet |
| Product Watch | Free | Scheduled about a month out | not live yet |
| Launching Next | Free | Queue of about 4 months | not live yet |
| Uneed | Free queue or paid scheduling | Free line full for about 5 months | not scheduled |
Two lessons stood out. The listings published on the same day used different link attributes, so speed told me nothing about the link I would get. And tracking verification emails and expiring login links took more time than filling in forms.
Dofollow, nofollow and what a link is worth
If part of your goal is search visibility, look at how the platform links to you. Open a listing for an existing product, inspect the link to its website, and check the rel attribute. Google treats nofollow, ugc and sponsored as hints about how to consider links in Search. They identify unendorsed links, user-generated content and paid placements. "Dofollow" is just the informal name for a link without any of these attributes. Such a link may contribute to rankings, but its SEO value is not guaranteed.
A few other things are worth checking while you are there:
noindex meta tag or header. This is separate from robots.txt, which controls crawling, not indexing. Google has to be able to fetch the page to see a noindex rule at all.A nofollow link from a platform with the right audience can still be worth more than a dofollow link from a directory nobody visits. Treat link type as one factor, not the whole decision.
Badge requirements and other strings attached
Some directories ask you to place their badge or a link back to them on your site before they publish your listing, or in exchange for a faster review. This is a trade. You give them a link from your site, and they give you a listing.
Decide in advance how you feel about this:
Google's spam policies name two practices here as link schemes. One is excessive link exchanges. The other is requiring a link without giving the site owner the choice of qualifying it, for example with rel="nofollow". So if a directory demands a badge link and forbids you from marking it, the requirement itself is against Google's rules. If you add a badge link, mark it with an appropriate rel value, and don't build a launch strategy on swapping links.
Review times and moderation
Some platforms review submissions manually, while others publish instantly. Review times and publication queues vary, so check both before submitting. A queue of several months does not necessarily mean several months of moderation.
Keep a simple log of every submission. Without it you will lose track quickly, and you will not know which platforms are still pending and which quietly rejected you. A plain table is enough:
| Platform | Date submitted | Account email | Expected review | Status | Listing URL | Link type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Example Directory | 2026-10-20 | you@yourdomain.com | 2 to 3 days | pending |
Use one email address for all submissions, and store passwords in a password manager, not in the log.
Prepare your listing once, reuse it everywhere
Most submission forms ask for the same things in slightly different shapes. Prepare them once in a single document:
Here is the difference between a weak and a usable tagline for a hypothetical invoicing tool:
Write the copy so it would still be true if a user read it after signing up. Overpromising costs you trust later, and some moderators reject listings that read like ads.
Measure what the launch actually did
Launch day upvotes are visible and exciting, so it is tempting to treat them as the score. But votes alone tell you little about activation, retention or willingness to pay.
A more useful habit is to check each platform twice, counting from the day the listing is published, not the day you submitted it:
Qualitative feedback helps too. Comments that address the idea, the execution, the design and the value of a product tell you more about what to fix than a vote count does.
A short checklist
Before you submit anywhere, ask:
Launching is less about finding the one perfect platform and more about choosing a handful of good fits, preparing well, and measuring what happens afterwards. If you want to try it here, submitting a product to RadarMakers is free, and the community rates launches on idea, execution, design and value rather than votes alone.
Sign in to join the discussion
Log in